> You can't really compare that. Can and did. ;) (just trying to add a little humor) > First of all, the "minor" > releases of OSX are all pretty big upgrades (OSX will always > be 10.something). Second, these minor releases are viewed as > such big development branches that support for the older one > goes on after the new one is released. That's your opinion and I respect it. However, I don't think they were that big a deal. Most of the features added were things that were blatantly missing in the initial release. Like Expose. Sheesh. Windows has had similar functionality (although not as flashy) through its task bar since 1995. I'm trying to start a PC vs. Mac war. I'm just explaining why I didn't find Expose something worth charging for. I'm sure you disagree. So we'll have to agree to disagree. > That's just your opinion. :o) Yep and I'm sticking to it. :) > Maybe the changes didn't mean > anything to you, but 10.0, 10.1 and 10.2 have quite > fundamental differences in the heart of the OS. And that's your opinion. ;) > "Minor" is just a name for the second number, but in the case > of OSX (where the major number is actually part of the > product name), it means something totally different than for Logic. I hope you're right and I'm wrong! Kind regards, Kamm
Message
RE: [Logic_Cafe] Upgrading to Logic 7 from Logic Plat 6.4.3
2005-03-22 by Kamm Schreiner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.