Thanks, Stefan. The ink I have is thick and black. The thickness is why a grooved point is necessary. Although the post I mentioned says this ink is made for plotting on copper that's not what the tech rep for Staedtler says. It's for plotting on very smooth surfaces. I will keep my eyes out for a suitable plotter pen. And a plotter if I can find a source of free ones <g>. I do use toner transfer and am quite happy with it. I guess I just can't leave well enough alone. Grant --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Trethan <stefan_trethan@g...> wrote: > don't build a plotter ;-) ask the local pc gurus, i got mine for free with > a load of pens. > However, there was no carbide pen included :-(. > I have read the same text you have read and tried to find a carbide pen. > finally got one at ebay, but not one, more like 10 or more instead at > ebay... > still for some eur 30 or so.. > > i have one set carbide tipped pens and one set steel pens. > only the smallest (0,18mm) has a X-groove. however this does not change > much in my opinion. > > Of course i tried several of the pens with staedtler red ink. > The problem was that the ink layer is thinner than with a felt tip, the > trailing edge > of the metal tip seems to "scrape off" a part of the layer. > > Finally i gave it up, i still have the 25x pocket microscope from this > ebay auction and > also some other stuff - so it was not too bad a deal. > The plotter pens i have are not even complete pens, they are only exchange > tips, but they > contain the complete mechanism with wire and spring and all. had to build > an adapter for them. > > Of course you can try it, i can't stop you from wasting your time. maybe > if you don't want > to do more detailed work like smd it might just work. > You must use a low-acid etchant, like ferric cloride (i think) or CuCl > with low acid content. > > One thing that definitely works is using a felt-tip pen to apply the ink. > but it is hard to get > any fine enough trace width with it. > > Again, i can't stop you, i can only tell you that i had a perfect toner > transfer result (with things > like 6,66mil traces) with WAY lower time and WAY lower money investment. > > > I'm still planning on setting up the plotter for component layout one day. > (the problem with that is that i need to update my librarys as i never > payd any attention to the > component outline..) > > > If you really want to do it get a plotter (dont build) and buy a expensive > pen, > then try, fail, and finally become a toner transfer convert like me ;-). > > If everything works out perfectly you will still have design limitations, > like no holes in the > pads, limited track width, etc... and plotting will be MUCH slower than > making a toner transfer. > > > Well, a teacher once told me the experience is all that counts, not the > result, so i really > shouldn't try to stop you experimenting. > > > Best of luck, you will need it.. > > And don't forget to use a "soft" etchant... no 35%Hcl with a load of H2O2 > ;-) > > If you have any questions feel free to ask. > > ST
Message
Re: Penn Plotter direct etch resist application
2004-04-25 by grantfair2001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.