Stefan Trethan wrote: >>>I would vote for top posting, i was told in the past to bottom post and >>>so i did. Still i find it inconvenient and would like to see how the others think. >> >>You still need to cut the 100+ trailing lines off anyway, so it's no >>extra work to do that, then bottom-post, which should all be visible >>on the screen. >> > The top posting in not for the convenience of the poster, it is for the > convenience of the reader. > If the mail is short enough, ok, you can see all on the screen. > But if it is more than one page (or one half depending on mail software) > you need to scroll any mail you want to read down. > I read more posts than i write, as does anyone, so i would rather have > convenience in reading many mails > a day, rather than just not reading at all posts with a topic not so interesting. > The only advantage of bottom post so far is "logical order" which is > doubtful, as normal (non-list) emails are normally answered on top too? > > I will do as the majority (or the owner) says, but i also will voice my > different opinion. The problem is mail clients that don't have a setting to autoscroll to the bottom of messages.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: trimming / bottom posting
2004-01-31 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.