Simon Gornall wrote: > > Oh, I'll easily admit I don't fully understand everything I need to > know for this :) Yet :) > And i admit that didn't look to what CAT4101 were. > > > My understanding was that you tend to vary either current or voltage > in the pulses (so a constant-voltage, varying current supply would be > ok). The CAT4101 has a wide range of voltage over which it will work > (2-24v), so I'm covered, as long as a constant supply level at varying > current is ok. You need fixed voltage limited current that varies with board size. The most important is respect current densities. > Ok - I'd seen 2x rather than 3x, but ok. I was aware it ought to be > different, that was why there are 15 CAT4101's in the forward > direction and 30 of them in the reverse direction. I wasn't actually > planning on running them at max output, and the current ought to be a > function of the board area anyway, right ? My mistake, 10 to 20 for time relation, 3 or more for current. Just checked. You wont need more psu power on reverse. Such sort pulse can be helped with capacitors. But i should only speak about current not power since voltage is still unknown to me... > Right - I was planning on using the 5v supply on an ATX PSU and see > where that got me. If I get burning, I'll reduce the voltage/current. > If I get nothing, I'll increase the voltage (dropping it from the 12v > supply on the PSU down to 6, 8, 10 etc. using a simple voltage divider > and big resistors) and see what I can do. It's a relatively small > investment for me (apart from the chemistry from LPKF) because I have > a lot of the stuff on-hand. I use CAT4101's in LED drivers, and I have > a spare 50 or so of them lying around :) That way you can simple use 3.3V output and a big tank where you adjust distance between anodes and cathode. Simao
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Quimical VIAs
2010-12-16 by Simao Cardoso
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.