Hi Robert, It does look like he did a large block on the second example - check the photos section again. It appears to have come out just fine. I just did a very crude test with durabrite inks. I printed on plain paper and got some water on it to see if it would run like I have seen with other inks. It didn't run or bleed nearly as bad - although it did bleed a bit. If I didn't NEED my CX6600 for so much important business work, I would run some samples right now with it. But I simply cannot risk losing this printer - it's only a week or so old! Chris --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hedan <robert.hedan@...> wrote: > > I just realized that the original poster had not done any copper fill. > > Volkan, is it possible to get another test print using copper fill? If you > don't have such a feature, can you just print a large square using Word, > PaintBrush or anything? > > It would be nice to know if you get quality results using your setup before > we invest. > > Thanks! > > Robert > :) > > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De > la part de mycroft2152 > Envoyé : avril 14 2006 09:51 > À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Epson inkjet results - quick trial > > > Quick trial: > > Epson R220 > Epson Durabrite ink > Thin flexible Copperclad-not prepared > Dried / cured with hair dryer > > Results: > > Ran through printer fine > Thin lines printed well > Wide areas - beaded up > Printed areas did not move when rubbed > Water resistancy - poor > > Failure! > Ink did not 'grab' onto surface > > Next trial: > > Prepare board, scour and pre-etch with Tarn-X and repeat. > > Myc >
Message
Re: Epson inkjet results - quick trial
2006-04-14 by lcdpublishing
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.