>You could probably sell that 2200 and have more than enough to buy >several lesser Epsons. I already have a 785EPX and a R320 as well. You can't control the ink density with these lesser Epsons and their dimensional accuracy is inferior. No where as bad as a laser but still not as good as the 2200. Also, the 2200 has a straight path and can handle 1.3mm thick media, so it would be the perfect candidate for direct to copper printing even though it's not really a primary concern of mine right now. It's gathering dust for two reasons...It guzzles ink for photo printing...Ultrachrome ink sucks on transparencies. But thanks to your empty cartridges link I'm about to change all that. --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Steve" <alienrelics@...> wrote: >
Message
Re: Epson inkjet results
2006-04-13 by derekhawkins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.