On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:58:09 +0100, protonceksleeperman
<protoncek@...> wrote:
that's a lot of money to waste.
I really must try to debug that silicone paper. Maybe it would work well
with a heavier coat of toner.
I'll try printing twice, a large area, then it doesn't matter if i hit the
exact same spot.
results are simply much more reliable and repeatable.
ST
<protoncek@...> wrote:
> I'll post just once and reply to all...Now that's pricy. It's a lot of sheets too, but if it doesn't work well
>
> first to stefan:
>
> I found one dealer who should have this HP high gloss laser paper.
>
> It's just...why is always the best and most expensive ?it only comes
>
> in 200 sheets and costs about 56 euro...i'll go and ask them if they
>
> have it.
>
that's a lot of money to waste.
I really must try to debug that silicone paper. Maybe it would work well
with a heavier coat of toner.
I'll try printing twice, a large area, then it doesn't matter if i hit the
exact same spot.
>My recommendation is to get a laminator or modify a fuser fairly soon, the
> i have one old iron which doesn't have steam, but i guess i'll
>
> better check out if it has level surface...otherwise aluminium plate
>
> is a good solution.
results are simply much more reliable and repeatable.
ST