derekhawkins wrote: >>Did you use a single ballast and series connection for those tubes? >>How many starters did it need? > > Each "tube" is actually a separate lamp with its own ballast and > starter. The lamps were on sale at the time with each costing less > than a single UV tube. Here's a shot of the box with the lamps open > when only four were installed; > > http://www.pbase.com/eldata/image/52324065 I got a 20W (equiv. to 100W filament) spiral-type black-light blue UV compact flourescent lamp yesterday from Bunnings for $10. These would work well in a conventional round reflector. http://www.nelsonlamps.com.au/ Page 5 of: http://www.nelsonlamps.com.au/products%20page/PDF%20Files/Lamps%20CFL%20Superior%205000hr.pdf You could just mount a few light sockets in the bottom of a box (or one socket and a reflector) for these and put a plate of glass and lid on top of the box.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....
2005-12-10 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.