Okay, as you all know I am far from experienced with PCB making. I have gone through a variety of trials with the toner transfer method and can appreciate it. I can somewhat see it's limitations with regard to how small of a trace I could do using this process. However, if I ever need more detail, I could do the photoresist process. The chemicals work good and efficient, all around, etching works very good. Now about 6 months ago, I was wanting to do isolation milling as I believed it to be better. However, I am pretty much now in the belief trying isolation milling will not show any advantages over what I am doing now. I seriously doubt it would be faster than chemical etching. I don't think the tool bits would last very long, so I would guess that the tooling costs would negate the costs of the chemicals. Even though you would be cutting with a very small diameter pointed tool, I don't think you could get better results (finer pitches and traces) using a milling process. Is there something that I am not seeing in that process that would give it advantages over chemical etching? Thanks guys Chris
Message
Having a bit of experience now, why would someone want to do isolation milling?
2005-12-08 by lcdpublishing
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.