lcdpublishing wrote: > ANother thought I had about using the photo-resist boards was the > potential for another problem that I don't know if there is a work > around or not. > > If you expose a board and the exposure doesn't work out as planed, > it is then ruined isn't it? If you haven't developed it, you can expose it more if you align the printout again with what you can see on the resist. > For example, with toner transfer, if it turns out bad, a missing or > pitted traces or whatever else can go wrong, I wash off the toner > and do it again and again till it is good enough for what I need. > The only loss I have is time and paper. > > However, from an ignorant point of view ( I have never tried this > process), if something goes wrong, the board can't be used again in > the potoresist process can it? Not after developing. However, you can scrape bits of resist off with a scriber and add bits with a resist pen. > Also, as I don't know what things look like along the way, can you > see the traces with the resist on them after developing? If so, > what does the developed photoresist look like? Undeveloped, the patterns look slightly lighter or darker than unexposed areas. When developed, you can see the copper.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....
2005-11-18 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.