It usually doesn't go wrong once you figured out how to do it, but the same is the case with TT, i very rarely have a bad transfer. With my photoboards the resist was discolored faintly after exposure (i think it was yellowish but not 100% sure). After developing one could see it quite well, it was kind of smoky transparent. My main problems were exposure (getting a decent film was impossible with my laser printer and the papers/transparencies i had. I used this spray for a while that makes paper translucent, but it was not really good, it works great as label remover tho.) Also, i had some old board material that didn't develop very well. I'm sure i could have gotten it to work eventually, but TT seemed, and is, so much less work, and this way i can also make component legend and front panels and stuff (even my a house number sign is a PCB!). ST On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:55:36 +0100, lcdpublishing <lcdpublishing@...> wrote: > > If you expose a board and the exposure doesn't work out as planed, > > it is then ruined isn't it? > > > For example, with toner transfer, if it turns out bad, a missing or > > pitted traces or whatever else can go wrong, I wash off the toner > > and do it again and again till it is good enough for what I need. > > The only loss I have is time and paper. > > > However, from an ignorant point of view ( I have never tried this > > process), if something goes wrong, the board can't be used again in > > the potoresist process can it? > > > Also, as I don't know what things look like along the way, can you > > see the traces with the resist on them after developing? If so, > > what does the developed photoresist look like? > > > TIA > > > Chris >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....
2005-11-17 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.