----- Original Message ----- From: "derekhawkins" <derekhawkins@...> > >It won't be even close. Pigment inks, maybe possibly, but not dyes. >>If you also have a laserjet, hold up one of each to a bright light. > > Regardless of ink type, the density of laserjet print **on > transparencies** will always be vastly inferior to inkjet print. Just > about everybody knows that. I don't know it, so I guess I'll have to prove it for myself. I'll run some through the lab's densitometer later in the week. >>They're icky, likely from over etching. Still working on that part. > > You're a prime candidate for switching if that bothers you because > that's the characteristic signature of a TT board. It's due to hand-me- > down toner....LOL! I puzzled over this for a little bit, and it niggled at me as I hurried through a small board so I would have something to scan. Could it be your standards differ than mine? Higher? Lower? That doesn't seem right; quality is quality. I'm used to commercially produced prototype boards. Certainly I have no expectation my own boards will be in the same league. But laughably inferior? No, that doesn't seem right. The first few boards were OK. Not great; just OK. The holes aren't plated, and the pads could use a good fluxing and tinning. But the copper itself was just fine, better than just OK. And then it hit me, as I stared at the toner black traces staring back at me from the rinse water. That's rather odd... Pulsar sells a green sealing film to overcoat the toner. In my haste this evening, I forgot to apply it. I had etched the board with only the toner for a resist. Sure enough, wiping off the toner with Goof-Off left a behind a mottled mess where there should be shiny copper. The trace edges were pitted; and the SL3 pads were... just yuck. It would take a blind man to miss the difference, never mind the microscopy. Derek, I know now what you must be saying. Toner alone is not a very good resist. However, combined with a sealing film, such as Pulsar's green TRF, toner transfer is every bit as good as any other process. And it's fast, too. As late as it is over here, I know I can just run off another one before heading to bed.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....
2005-11-17 by Mike Young
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.