Homebrew PCBs

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "derekhawkins" <derekhawkins@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 6:46 PM
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....


> >I've tried both TT and photo-etching, and much prefer the latter.
>>Admittedly, I only used a clothes iron for the TT rather than a
>>laminator, but I couldn't see the point of getting a fairly expensive
>>piece of equipment that might not work when a simple home-made UV
>>exposure unit would cost a lot less and give better results.
>
> The prevailing view seems to be that since industry uses photoetching
> then it's far too expensive and too involved for the home. Either that
> or "we must do things differently" prevails. Normally, I don't get
> involved in these TT debates but the insinuation by a poster that one
> needs a $500.00 exposure box for photoetching was too much to resist.

Mine cost me under 25 GBP - just a couple of UV tubes, ballasts and 
starters, some MDF, wood and a piece of glass. It doesn't look very pretty 
but it works very well.

Leon 

---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses but it is your responsibility 
to maintain up to date anti virus software on the device that you are
currently using to read this email. ]