Seems a lightbox is easier and cheaper than making a laminator... Ballendo --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Les Newell <lesnewell@h...> wrote: > > There isn't much to my system. I use an Epson colour printer with Rapid > Electronics inkjet transparency. I found that green works best. Black > and red both seem to have a crazing effect which can cause broken > tracks. This is with the new Durabrite inks. The older inks seemed to > work better but my old Stylus Color 600 died. The layout has to be > printed so the ink side goes towards the board. > > The light box is a simple wooden box with four UV tubes about 100mm > under sheet of glass. There is a sheet of aluminium foil under the tubes > to reflect the light upwards. There is a lid to clamp the board in place > while exposing it and I found that a couple of layers of bubble wrap > between the lid and board gives a good even pressure. When you first set > up you need to work out how long an exposure is needed. This is pretty > simple. Print a layout and stick the transparency to a piece of board > with sticky tape. On the back of the board make a series of marks, > roughly even spaced. About 7 or 8 will probably do. Place it in the > light box with a piece of aluminium foil between the board and the > glass, with one edge lined up with the first mark leaving a small strip > exposed. Expose the board for 1 minute, move the strip to line up with > the next mark, expose for 1 minute and so on. You now have a board that > at one end has been exposed for 8 or 9 minutes and the other end that > has only been exposed for 1 minute. When you develop the board it is > quite easy to see where it is under and over developed. Find the best > part of the board and you will know how long you need to expose the > board. This is a bit tedious but you only need to do it once. Some > boards are very sensitive so you may have to repeat the experiment using > different timing. > > Exposure time varies as the tubes warm up so I usually turn them on > 10-15 minutes in advance to give them time to warm up. I use precoated > board and I can recommend Microtrak board from Mega Electronics - I > think It is actually made by Bungard. It has a thin coating which > reduces undercutting and the resist coating is fairly tolerant to > under/over exposure. Developer is a level teaspoon of caustic soda > granules in a litre of water. A few drops of detergent added to the mix > helps the developer wet the surface. I drop the board in a tray, add > enough developer to cover the surface then rock the tray. As developing > progresses you see streaks of darker resist appearing in the developer. > Once they stop appearing the board is done. A quick dip in the etch tank > will hilight any areas that have been missed. > > I normally use .012" track+gap (~0.3mm) because I know it is reliable. > 0.25T&G shouldn't be a problem. The most important thing is to get a > good quality print out of your printer. I tried a Lexmark and that > produced a very fuzzy print. > > Les > > about 100mm awa > > Jim Miller wrote: > > >Hi Les > > > >Is your method written up somewhere? > > > >What sort of linewidths do you have success with? I'm looking at doing some > >work with AD9958 this winter and it has 0.25mm pads on 0.5mm pitch. > > > >tnx > >jim > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > > > >If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here: > >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs_Archives/ > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Message
Re: Update on toner transfer problems reported a week ago....
2005-11-16 by ballendo
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.