Doepfer

Florian, 

 I hope you don't mind but I added your method to my blog page, crediting you with the A-165 idea and including a hyperlink to your book at Schneidersladen. 

Nick



> On Nov 12, 2014, at 10:18 AM, "Florian Anwander fanwander@mnet-online.de [Doepfer_a100]" <Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Nick
> 
> Great blog post!
> 
> When I read your post, another method to create a shuffled clock came to 
> my mind:
> 
> Any LFO -> A-162(1) Trigger Delay -> A-165 Trigger Modifier +/-Out -> 
> A-162(2) Trigger Delay (or A-142-1)
> 
> Or
> 
> Any LFO -> A-142-1 Voltage Controlled Decay/Gate -> A-165 Trigger 
> Modifier +/-Out -> A-162(2) Trigger Delay (or A-142-1)
> 
> Or
> 
> LFO with variable Pulsewidth -> A-165 Trigger Modifier +/-Out -> A-162 
> Trigger Delay (or A-142-1)
> 
> All these methods have in common: The first trigger delay (or the 
> VC-Gate) creates a controllable pulse length for the LFO - it should be 
> more than 50%. This non-symmetrical pulse is converted into two spikes 
> by the Trigger Modifier. The second Trigger Delay creates the two 
> triggers wich are used for the sequencer steps (and eventually as gate 
> for the envelopes).
> 
> And btw, you are asking in your post:
> > Perhaps ratios <50% are techincally known by another name?
> Yes there is a name for. It is called "stumbling" ;-)
> To be honest: shuffle / swing ratios less than 50% are not interesting 
> from the musical point of view.
> 
> Florian
> 
> Am 11.11.2014 04:10, schrieb Nicholas Keller maq163x2@gmail.com 
> [Doepfer_a100]:
> >
> >
> > http://niroke.blogspot.com/2014/11/more-155-tricks-way-to-shuffle-your.html?m=1
> 
>