Doepfer

> Nina and I have figured out a way of making it smoother in a way 
> that's more predictive than changing things after the fact.  It 
> doesn't involve slew limiting.  It's inherently imperfect but for 
> most practical purposes should be the most useful solution.  It's 
> less elegant under the hood, but the outcome should be good.  
> She's a bit more tight lipped than me though, so I'd have to run 
> it past her before divulging all our secrets. :)

I see ! Sounds promising.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer