Dieter, say we have 4 vcos and a 4-stage ASR. We feed the VCOs a melody like A-C-D-E On the A-152, we would see (A 0 0 0) (A C 0 0) (A C D 0) (A C D E) etc On an ASR, we would see (A 0 0 0) (C A 0 0) (D C A 0) (E D C A) (A E D C) etc You are right in that after one cycle, we will have the 4 voltages available simultaneously. BUT you are wrong in assuming that the VCOs will all be the same. Imagine 4 mono synths with completely different sounds. On the A-152, each synth will *stay on the same note* in this example. On the ASR, each synth will be playing the melody, but delayed by one step. Big difference. Or lets say we have a 3-step melody, A-C-D, running into the same setup. A-152: (A 0 0 0) (A C 0 0) (A C D 0) (A C D A) (C C D A) (C D D A) (C D A A) etc ASR: (A 0 0 0) (C A 0 0) (D C A 0) (A D C A) (C A D C) (D C A D) etc I hope this clears it up a bit. Denis On Aug 1, 2011, at 1:01 PM, <yahoo@doepfer.de> wrote: > > Dieter, > > > > the main point of the ASR is that one very clock pulse, you get a > > different value on *all* outputs, with all outputs with a number > > greater than 1 showing the "history" of the input CV. The A-152 > > will hold the last value on each destination defined at the point > > that that stage became inactive. So the output value of a stage > > is updated only when it becomes active. Very different from an ASR. > > > > One usage example of an ASR is routing a melodic CV sequence to a > > number of VCOs --- think "canon": the same melody played by all > > vcos with one sequence step delay between them. > > > > Actually I think that an AD/DA based ASR with quantisation > > options and perhaps 8 or even 16 stages & outputs could be a very > > successful module. > > > > Best, > > Denis Goekdag > > Denis, > > I still have problems to understand the audible difference in case of e.g. > three VCOs. The only difference between the A-152 and an ASR is that the > "history" CVs are available at different outputs. In case of an ASR the > "history" voltages are shifted to the next CV outputs. In case of the A-152 > they remain at the same CV output. But from my point of view this does not > make an audible difference (unless you insert e.g. slew limiters between ASR > CV Out and VCO CV In) as the three CV output voltages are the same. They > only appear at different sockets. If the VCOs are equivalent this should > make no difference. please correct me if I'm wrong. > > Dieter > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: AW: AW: [Doepfer_a100] Shift Register
2011-08-01 by Denis Gökdag
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.