Doepfer

Thanks Florian for sharing your knowledge.
I thought that maybe buyng the HP filter only for the use you mentioned in
the vocoder is a little wasted....(?). If I just have one in the doepfer
synth architecture I can use it also for the vocoder in the way you
explained: do you think it will worth the purchase only for this use?
I can also use the high pass output inside the A-129\1 for this purpose or a
sampled HPfiltered version of the formant..... in the first case I lost the
modulation of the filter but I think it is in a little range, in the second
case I just have to sinchronizing two recorded audio....
But I don't know if the result is the same you have in mind. I tried one
time the HP output of the A-129\1 but I was experimenting really a lot at
that time for have a right perception of the result! I'll try soon
again.....
My best regards.

2010/8/24 Florian Anwander <fanwander@mnet-online.de>

>
>
> Hi Mort
>
>
> > just one external compressor for the voice. Do a second compressor
> > will be usefull for the carrier in your experience?
> A compressor for the carrier is recommended in the case, that the
> carrier is not a signal with continous level. Examples: a strings or
> organ sound is continous, it does not need compression. A sequence of
> strummed guitar chords has many different levels and compression is
> recommended.
>
>
> > Increasing the understandability of vocoded speech is one of my global
> > purpose.
> I recommend NOT to use very modulated or chorus'ed sounds as carrier. To
> My experience a single VCO sound with a Pulswave of 75% Pulswidth but no
> PWM is perfect. If you want to have chorus like effects, then put the
> chorus effect only on the voiced part of the signal, but not on the
> unvoiced part. The easiest way to achieve this will be again the
> highpasss filter, that should be mixed with the vocoder sound after the
> chorus.
>
> Florian
>  
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]