Primarily the interest is sonics. I am wondering if there is some interesting possible sound that we don't really have easy access to with subtractive synthesis. Or maybe just a cool shape that is some way much different from the standards. On Jan 14, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Mark Pulver wrote: > > In terms of sonics or control? > > In short... YES to either side of the question. > > But, you can "generally" create many other waveforms by having > access to > multiples of the 4 basic food groups. The exceptions would be when > you want > a reverse saw to be able to do something regarding control, > sonically a > reverse saw would sound just about exactly the same as a forward saw. > > The core behind your question is a great reason to have MANY MANY > VCOs in > your rig. I think I have over 60 in various forms. > > Mark > ----- > Monroe Eskew (04:47 PM 1/14/2009) wrote: > >Can anyone think of other waveforms besides the standard ones that > >might be interesting to have in a synth? (Standard = sine, saw, > >triangle, rectangle) > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Doepfer_a100] other waveforms?
2009-01-15 by Monroe Eskew
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.