Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Permajet MonochromePro and UT2

Permajet MonochromePro and UT2

2006-09-06 by keith_r_smith_99

Paul said in another thread some time ago that the Permajet Monochrome 
Pro ink set are very similar to UT2.  I have been trying the Permajet 
and find that the U&2 curves really don't work well.  

So the question is How similar are these two?  Should the UT2 curves 
work?

Keith

RE: [Digital BW] Permajet MonochromePro and UT2

2006-09-06 by Paul Roark

What printer?  The version for the 2100 is like the UT7.  This may be what's
happening.

 

Paul

www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  

 

 

  _____  
Show quoted textHide quoted text
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
keith_r_smith_99
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:04 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Permajet MonochromePro and UT2

 

Paul said in another thread some time ago that the Permajet Monochrome 
Pro ink set are very similar to UT2. I have been trying the Permajet 
and find that the U&2 curves really don't work well. 

So the question is How similar are these two? Should the UT2 curves 
work?

Keith

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: [Digital BW] Permajet MonochromePro and UT2

2006-09-07 by keith_r_smith_99

Sorry I should ave said.  It;s a 1290.  i managed to get a working 
one from 2 free broken ones, so I am trying it out.  At the moment I 
am very unimpressed with the results from Monochromepro.  
The prints using PS curves are poor, The UT2 curves don't seem right 
and the curves from northlight-images don't seem right either.

In fact none of them are as good as the print I get from my 2100 
(using Lyson Fotonic dye (yes I know..) inks and a curve I managed to 
liniarize using a scanner.

I need to decide whether to keep with the 1290 - maybe using real UT2 
inks, or sell it and get a 2400 for colour and switch the 2100 to UT7 
or something.  or maybe even just use the 2400 with QTR fro B&W.  

Will the 1290 ever be better than the 2400/OTR combo?

Thanks

Keith



--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
<paul.roark@...> wrote:
>
> What printer?  The version for the 2100 is like the UT7.  This may 
be what's
> happening.
> 
>  
> 
> Paul
> 
> www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> keith_r_smith_99
> Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:04 AM
> To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Digital BW] Permajet MonochromePro and UT2
> 
>  
> 
> Paul said in another thread some time ago that the Permajet 
Monochrome 
> Pro ink set are very similar to UT2. I have been trying the 
Permajet 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> and find that the U&2 curves really don't work well. 
> 
> So the question is How similar are these two? Should the UT2 curves 
> work?
> 
> Keith
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

Re: [Digital BW] Permajet MonochromePro and UT2

2006-09-07 by Roy Harrington

Keith,

You have a lot of unknowns so it's pretty hard to tell what's wrong.
I'm not familiar with the Permajet inks but QTR does have profiles for UT2
inks on the 1280/1290.   
First, I'd make sure your printer is printing all the inks -- nozzle checks.
Then try out QTR with some of the profiles.

If it's still not to your liking you need to be more explicit about the problem.

Roy

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "keith_r_smith_99" 
<keith@...> wrote:
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>
> Sorry I should ave said.  It;s a 1290.  i managed to get a working 
> one from 2 free broken ones, so I am trying it out.  At the moment I 
> am very unimpressed with the results from Monochromepro.  
> The prints using PS curves are poor, The UT2 curves don't seem right 
> and the curves from northlight-images don't seem right either.
> 
> In fact none of them are as good as the print I get from my 2100 
> (using Lyson Fotonic dye (yes I know..) inks and a curve I managed to 
> liniarize using a scanner.
> 
> I need to decide whether to keep with the 1290 - maybe using real UT2 
> inks, or sell it and get a 2400 for colour and switch the 2100 to UT7 
> or something.  or maybe even just use the 2400 with QTR fro B&W.  
> 
> Will the 1290 ever be better than the 2400/OTR combo?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" 
> <paul.roark@> wrote:
> >
> > What printer?  The version for the 2100 is like the UT7.  This may 
> be what's
> > happening.
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Paul
> > 
> > www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/>  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >   _____  
> > 
> > From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> > keith_r_smith_99
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 9:04 AM
> > To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Digital BW] Permajet MonochromePro and UT2
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > Paul said in another thread some time ago that the Permajet 
> Monochrome 
> > Pro ink set are very similar to UT2. I have been trying the 
> Permajet 
> > and find that the U&2 curves really don't work well. 
> > 
> > So the question is How similar are these two? Should the UT2 curves 
> > work?
> > 
> > Keith
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>

RE: [Digital BW] Permajet MonochromePro and UT2

2006-09-08 by Paul Roark

>... It's a 1290.

OK, then it's similar to UT2.

...

> Will the 1290 ever be better than the 2400/OTR combo?

The main reason to use a 1290 over a 2400 is cost.  The 2400 is an
outstanding printer.  I think it puts too much color in the "Advanced B&W"
mode printing.  That's why I have one set up with MIS LK, LLK and even LLK
in the Y spot.  (MIS LK and LLK are warmer than Epson K3 and give this setup
a better range.) Then it uses the minimum amount of color and makes prints
that are about as good as it gets.

A 1290 that is working correctly can visually match the 2400, but it would
be slower. 

Re-check all the settings by looking at my UT2 write-up at
http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/UT2-Readme.htm

Also, print see the test files I have at
http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Test-files.htm  These will tell you whether
the inks are loaded correctly.

Good luck.

Paul
www.PaulRoark.com

Re: Permajet MonochromePro and UT2

2006-09-14 by keith smith

Thanks Paul and Roy for you input.  I have given up on the 1290 - I could not get it to print consistently using either the curves or QTR - nozzel clogs etc.

I will probably get a 2400 soon and use that for B&W until I convert the 2100 to UT7.

keith

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.