Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Thread

Hahnemuhle paper - printing side

Hahnemuhle paper - printing side

2003-05-22 by interrogtr@aol.com

I've got some William Turner paper from Hahnemuhle.  From what I've 
researched, only one side is coated but for the life of me, I can't tell yet 
which side is coated.  It's not like EAM, where the coated side is bright 
white and the non-coated side is more of a creamy color.  On the William 
Turner paper, both sides are very bright white, with maybe the most subtle 
difference between them.  About the most significant difference I can see 
between the two sides is that one side has more of a patterned textured look 
about it (like perhaps it came from between two rollers) and the other side 
has more of a non-patterned white washed look to it.  I'm guessing that the 
non-patterned side is the coated side but it's very difficult to tell.

Does anyone have experience with this paper and found a way to identify which 
side is coated and which is not?  

Thanks for any help.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Hahnemuhle paper - printing side

2003-05-22 by Roy Harrington

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, 
interrogtr@a... wrote:
> I've got some William Turner paper from Hahnemuhle.  From 
what I've 
> researched, only one side is coated but for the life of me, I can't 
tell yet 
> which side is coated.  It's not like EAM, where the coated side 
is bright 
> white and the non-coated side is more of a creamy color.  On 
the William 
> Turner paper, both sides are very bright white, with maybe the 
most subtle 
> difference between them.  About the most significant difference 
I can see 
> between the two sides is that one side has more of a 
patterned textured look 
> about it (like perhaps it came from between two rollers) and 
the other side 
> has more of a non-patterned white washed look to it.  I'm 
guessing that the 
> non-patterned side is the coated side but it's very difficult to tell.
> 
> Does anyone have experience with this paper and found a way 
to identify which 
> side is coated and which is not?  
> 
> Thanks for any help.

Its very easy to tell.  Just touch a corner of the paper to your
tongue -- it sticks on the coated side of the paper but 
not on the other.  Sounds weird but is very effective.

Roy
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Hahnemuhle paper - printing side

2003-05-22 by tomoc

The "more" textured side is the printing side...generally it might 
curl a little...the curled side is top...

You can wet your fingers and pinch a corner...the side that is 
stickiest is the coated side...or if you're wild and crazy like some 
here, you just lick the dude and you will know.

cheers,

Tom O'Connell


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, interrogtr@a... 
wrote:
> I've got some William Turner paper from Hahnemuhle.  From what I've 
> researched, only one side is coated but for the life of me, I can't 
tell yet 
> which side is coated.  It's not like EAM, where the coated side is 
bright 
> white and the non-coated side is more of a creamy color.  On the 
William 
> Turner paper, both sides are very bright white, with maybe the most 
subtle 
> difference between them.  About the most significant difference I 
can see 
> between the two sides is that one side has more of a patterned 
textured look 
> about it (like perhaps it came from between two rollers) and the 
other side 
> has more of a non-patterned white washed look to it.  I'm guessing 
that the 
> non-patterned side is the coated side but it's very difficult to 
tell.
> 
> Does anyone have experience with this paper and found a way to 
identify which 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> side is coated and which is not?  
> 
> Thanks for any help.
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Hahnemuhle paper - printing side

2003-05-22 by Clayton Jones

>Does anyone have experience with this paper and found a way to 
>identify which side is coated and which is not?  

I use a pencil to make a small mark in a corner.  The non-coated side
readily takes the mark, the coated side feels soft and resists taking 
the mark.

Regards,
Clayton


Info on black and white digital printing at    
http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Hahnemuhle paper - printing side

2003-05-22 by R Murai

Gently press a small corner of the paper between lightly dampened lips - the
coated side will stick/ the non-coated side won't.

rm
Show quoted textHide quoted text
>> Does anyone have experience with this paper and found a way to
>> identify which side is coated and which is not?
>

RE: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle paper - printing side

2003-05-22 by capuozzo

Two possible solutions-
1) See if there is a curl on the material- the coated side curls up.
2) Lick both sides- the side that stays wet longer is the coated side.

Capp
Show quoted textHide quoted text
  -----Original Message-----
  From: interrogtr@... [mailto:interrogtr@...]
  Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 12:07 AM
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
  Subject: [Digital BW] Hahnemuhle paper - printing side


  I've got some William Turner paper from Hahnemuhle.  From what I've
  researched, only one side is coated but for the life of me, I can't tell
yet
  which side is coated.  It's not like EAM, where the coated side is bright
  white and the non-coated side is more of a creamy color.  On the William
  Turner paper, both sides are very bright white, with maybe the most subtle
  difference between them.  About the most significant difference I can see
  between the two sides is that one side has more of a patterned textured
look
  about it (like perhaps it came from between two rollers) and the other
side
  has more of a non-patterned white washed look to it.  I'm guessing that
the
  non-patterned side is the coated side but it's very difficult to tell.

  Does anyone have experience with this paper and found a way to identify
which
  side is coated and which is not?

  Thanks for any help.


  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and
other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - Include your full name with your message.
  - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
them short.
  - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or
"flames."
  - Complete your Yahoo profile.
  - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
resources on the homepage.




  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Re: Hahnemuhle paper - printing side

2003-05-22 by Steven Karafyllakis

And when you finally figure out which side to use, turn the batch 
over, and mark the back with a pencil so you don't have to keep 
checking!

Steve K--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tomoc" 
<TomOC@s...> wrote:
> The "more" textured side is the printing side...generally it might 
> curl a little...the curled side is top...
> 
> You can wet your fingers and pinch a corner...the side that is 
> stickiest is the coated side...or if you're wild and crazy like 
some 
> here, you just lick the dude and you will know.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Tom O'Connell
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, 
interrogtr@a... 
> wrote:
> > I've got some William Turner paper from Hahnemuhle.  From what 
I've 
> > researched, only one side is coated but for the life of me, I 
can't 
> tell yet 
> > which side is coated.  It's not like EAM, where the coated side 
is 
> bright 
> > white and the non-coated side is more of a creamy color.  On the 
> William 
> > Turner paper, both sides are very bright white, with maybe the 
most 
> subtle 
> > difference between them.  About the most significant difference 
I 
> can see 
> > between the two sides is that one side has more of a patterned 
> textured look 
> > about it (like perhaps it came from between two rollers) and the 
> other side 
> > has more of a non-patterned white washed look to it.  I'm 
guessing 
Show quoted textHide quoted text
> that the 
> > non-patterned side is the coated side but it's very difficult to 
> tell.
> > 
> > Does anyone have experience with this paper and found a way to 
> identify which 
> > side is coated and which is not?  
> > 
> > Thanks for any help.
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hahnemuhle paper - printing side

2003-05-23 by Thomas Keesling

Tom wrote:

> The "more" textured side is the printing side...generally it might
> curl a little...the curled side is top...
>
> You can wet your fingers and pinch a corner...the side that is
> stickiest is the coated side...or if you're wild and crazy like some
> here, you just lick the dude and you will know.


Or, just look at the paper using a loupe. The individual paper fibers are
clearly visible on the backside, but not on the coated side.

Tom Keesling
Intelligent Design, Inc.

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.