--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > How's that for no help at all???!! Tyler, Thanks, another step forward. By now this discussion is going everywhere, spread over multiple threads and gets harder and harder to keep track who posted what and where.. In the meanwhile I have been experimenting with split tones (QTR & MIS UT-#D) and got some promising results. Certainly a path to follow further. In addition I paid some more attention to the internal contrast and more precise sharpening. I must say, the three combined had an astonishing effect on some of my prints! Presently I'm considering to extend my MIS UT3D ink set in two very different directions: 1) go for an even wider gamut, by replacing the fairly useless (at least if one uses a RIP) neutral LLK by a custom greenish toner and 2) go for a split-tone K4 set by adding warm and cool LLLK toners at the sacrifice of the same neutral LLK toner and the selenium toner. I've no access yet to someone using a K7 set to compare results, but the current smoothness I'm getting is already very good. I doubt that I want to give up the very flexible tone control I've got now over that of an even smoother, but less flexible ink set. Joost
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"?
2006-11-27 by Joost Horsten
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.