> Bill Kennedy started working with K7 on a 2200 early on and he > said he had much better results with the Bauhaus rip. We just spent the last two weeks bringing up a 7600 with K7 split tones using BowHaus IJC/OPM. The standard K7 Split-Tone Sepia shadows/Neutral highlights and also Neutral shadows/Sepia highlights. Great RIP. Great inks. Scott King K2 Press Austin, Texas On Nov 25, 2006, at 7:25 PM, john dean wrote: > > I was using the curves supplied with QTR, the ones made > > by Jon's studio, so the it shouldn't have been my incompetence in > making curves that > > caused the problems. > > ------------------------- > > That was very interesting Mark and I appreciate the feed back. I > haven't talked to anyone doing exactly this, though I know a lot of > people must be. > > It isn't a problem with your incompetence because you sound > experienced. I believe the problem is the variation in the older > printers. The supplied curves with the 7000 were ok, but not great for > me. Everything was a bit flat with them. I was just about to set it up > with Studio Print too. However, I talked to Roy and then my 7000 was > linearized using icc create and custom curves for MY machine and a few > papers. When I did this it was a totally different output. This should > be done with any printers but these 7000's just vary so much that this > is totally mandatory. I belive Jon found that out with the 1280's too > which is why they started that IQuad thing making people custom > curves. > > Surely you are making custom linearizations and reading all the > patches with Studio Print? If so that is what the difference is I'm > sure. The newer printers like the 2200 and the 9600 are very close but > not perfect. They should be custom linearized too. The 10K's are very > different from unit to unit. It's funny though. Some people have > better luck with different rips on different machines. Bill Kennedy > started working with K7 on a 2200 early on and he said he had much > better results with the Bauhaus rip. Whatever works is is whatever > works I guess. > > John > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"?
2006-11-27 by Scott King
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.