-There are choices out there, but tone shifts and clogging do not, from what I can tell, correlate with which vendor one chooses. It used to be that Epson would insinuate that all third party inks are inferior due to clogging and whatnot. That may have been true in the past, but I don't think it is today. The vendors used most frequently on this list -- MIS and Piezo -- both sell good, third-generation inks that can hold their own in comparison to the major OEM products. Paul www.PaulRoark.com --------- As for color tone shifts and clogging I was primarily refering to Epson OEM inks when used with or without a rip for black and white. Roy's QTR and other rips allow huge improvements with Ultrachrome inks when used for monochrome but, in my experience whenever color inks are used within a workflow there is the potential for trouble. That may be why HP is including a total quad set within their 12 channel Z3100 printers. My comments about complaints on this list was in reference to the endless talk over the past year about struggling to get rid of this color cast or that color cast in this or that channel or realm of the tonal scale. It does seem to be a real issue with a lot of people. All pigment carts need to be shaken regularly for providing an even consistency of the particle and the base, even K7, but that is not because there are any color changes going on with PiezoTone now. The color is always totally consistent across the tonal range in all values, always. PiezoTone does far more than hold its own in reagard to OEM inksets, it surpasses them for the purpose they were designed to serve. I've got to get back to work. I have 7 more prints before finishing my 280 print portfolio of 16x20's. And, by the way every singe print of the 20 editions has the exact same neutral color and they were done over a period of two months. John
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"?
2006-11-25 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.