Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: How to get this "3 dimensional quality"?

2006-11-23 by BKPhoto@aol.com

Well said, John. In the end, it's how the photographer brings to the process what they know. Some of this is purely technical in nature, but it's the apprenticeship to an ideal that matters in the end. That's one of the reasons why the idea of an annual conference/gathering is so exciting. It would give folks an opportunity to see actual prints and share information firsthand.
 
 Happy Thanksgiving!
 
 Bill Kennedy 
    
 -----Original Message-----
 From: deanwork2003@...
 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
 Sent: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 8:42 AM
 Subject: [Digital BW] Re: How to get this "3 dimensional quality"?
 
     It has been my experience that all of the factors discussed play a
 role and you can't sepearate one from the others. First, you need a
 great scan or captured file, second you need good subtle inks. Third,
 fine quality coating of the media. Fourth, you need a good
 linearization of your printer and the tonal seperaton that a workable
 rip affords. Fifth, you need a good dmax in the bottom end. Sixth, the
 skills to work the tonal range in the mids and high values through
 subtle control of a curves adjustmet layer. Seventh, there is the
 amazing factor of localized dodging and burning to emphasize volumes.
 Finally there is careful sharpening, if it is an image with texture.
 Being able to co-ordinate all of these things is what makes a print
 come alive. That's eight steps, I'm sure somone can think of 2 more. 
 It is easier said than done.
 
 John
 
      
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL.  Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.