--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Tyler Boley" <tyler@...> wrote: > There are no guidelines I can arrive at for this, you simply have to > play. I've heard the "warm forward cool receding" thing before, and > think it's valid sometimes, other times not so much. I see warm as > more opaque than cool sometimes, not always. It's just a matter of > what brings the image alive on paper, hopefully. > I use these blends all kinds of ways, and despite using very similar > settings more often than not, I wind up trying several for each image > as I'm doing test prints anyway toward a final. I'm often suprised at > the conclusion and would not have been able to predict without seeing > it on paper, even with previews showing hue. Hi Tyler, Thanks for the reply. I was already afraid you were going to give an answer like this ;-). It would have been too good to be true to find the Magic Bullet ;-). Nevertheless, you have pointed a route that's worth exploring. Till so far I didn't take split toning too serious. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll have a try. Joost
Message
Re: How to get this "3 dimensional quality"?
2006-11-22 by horstenj
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.