Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] K3 vs. quad (Was Follow-up ...)

2006-11-21 by John Moody

Anything less than 100% is throwing away image information.  A better method
would be to move 4X away from your monitor.

Best regards,
John Moody

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Paul Roark
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 11:37 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Digital BW] K3 vs. quad (Was Follow-up ...)

Clayton,

> > images at http://tylerboley.com/info/RGB_Quad.jpg
<http://tylerboley.com/info/RGB_Quad.jpg>

> > http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Comparisons.jpg
<http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/Comparisons.jpg>


It's important to keep in mind that these are 0.8 inch high segments. To
get a better comparison of what a print would look like upon close
inspection, have the monitor view at about 25% in Photoshop. The bottom
line, in my opinion, is that there is no significant difference.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.