Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Re: Follow-up to Tyler's slithering from the cave

2006-11-17 by John Moody

Clayton,
Tyler has committed ridiculous amounts of time exploring the printing
process; inkjet relative to this forum, but plenty of wet as well.
Therefore, it’s natural that he may present a result that others wish to
emulate.
People like Tyler, Paul, Jon, Roy, and others experience the pleasure of
discovery, and offer their findings to the user community.  As such, it’s
expected that they will always be several steps down the road than the
users.  For those that enjoy the process, and can tolerate the tedium of it,
leaders e.g., Paul and Tyler, offer early information about directions they
are exploring, allowing the user community to join along if desired.  For
the patient and less adventuresome, they can order-up an MIS or Piezography
kit with full instructions, or send files to Custom Digital for printing.

Timing seems to be the root answer to your question.  We can get the same
technical result as their current best work, given time, money, and some
effort on our part.

BTW, being a lurker on the RIP support forums is a good way to learn about
RIPs, and judge which ones may fit your lifestyle; not a decision to make
quickly, IMO.

Best regards,
John Moody

-----Original Message-----
From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Clayton
Jones
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 10:28 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Follow-up to Tyler's slithering from the cave

Hello Bill ,
<snip>
Other questions: Is Tyler's RIP (Studio Print?) better than other
RIPs? Is it more expensive? More difficult to use? Can someone
using QTR or IJC or IP, other things being equal, not expect to get
that kind of result?
<snip>
 Regards,
Clayton



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.