Digital BW, The Print

At 01:37 PM Thursday 11/16/2006, you wrote:
>I've been using the 2200 for both black/white (with QTR) and color. On 
>the other hand I look forward to upgrading. Why, I'm not really sure. 
>Maybe it's so I can squeeze out just a little bit more. Meanwhile I 
>like to think that it's what the photograph says that counts 90% and 
>that only 10% goes to printers, paper, ink and profiles.

Hi,
I use the 2100 too with UC inks and QTR and on matte papers the results are pretty damn good. I think it's the image that counts most ... most people wouldn't know a 2100 print from a 2400 print anyway.

Richard

--
http://smallfield.vze.com
http://photos.smallfield.vze.com (Photos web site)
http://warkworth.vze.com/ (Warkworth photo essay)


   "Do, or do not. There is no 'try'." 
   --Yoda ('The Empire Strikes Back')