CDTobie@... wrote: > One difference to note is that art paper prints coming out for the 3800 > (especially B&W prints, the topic of this list) look TERRIBLE; the blacks run way > out into the shadow areas, and show major bronzing. You would think you'd done > something wrong... but 20 minutes later, the bronzing is gone, and the shadow > detail has magically appeared. It will take some getting used to. The price we pay for for faster and faster printers and coatings not keeping up with the speed on printing time. Makes you wonder if there's still some quality gain possible if you do the same printing slower. My first impression on the Photokina was that the 3800 prints had a more analogue photo quality and I like the quality of the K3 models more. Could it be what you describe here or could it be the new dithering that gives that image? Met vriendelijke groeten,Ernst | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Epson 3800 advice?
2006-11-03 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.