Oops, (5) should read M of UT-3D --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Shilesh Jani" <shileshjani@...> wrote: > > I would follow Paul's recommendation here: > > http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/UT-3D_Readme.pdf > > Except, I would replace the LK ink with PK. You will need to fill > this ink position yourself. An even better option is to fill this > position with Epson OEM K3 PK ink, sucked out of a 4800 cart. It will > give you much better Dmax on glossy (RC) papers. > > In summary, your inks will be: (1) Eboni for matte, (2) PK for > glossy, (3) C of UT-3D, (4) LC of UT-3D, (5) LC of UT-3D, (6) LM of > UT-3D, and (7) Y of UT-2 for the sepia toner. Using QTR and a > densitometer, you should be able to print on all paper types with > tones ranging from cold to sepia. > > Good luck. > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "monoengland" > <wilkinson27@> wrote: > > > > I have an Epson 2100 dedicated to B&W. I have been trying out Lyson > > monochrome ink CIS with their software (which is essentially the > > Bowhaus IJC/OPM) using a densitometer to linearise. I'm not that > happy > > with the results. I would like to achieve neutral, cool and sepia > > results on both matte(Han Photo Rag) and glossy, and would like to > try > > the UT inks from MIS as cartridges initially, using Quadtone RIP > and > > ICCs. I'm also interested in trying the newer Fibre Base Gloss > > (Permajet UK). Can anyone please help me with the pros and cons of > > UT3-D and UT7 inks in this quest? Many thanks. > > >
Message
Re: Dedicated 2100 and ink choice
2006-07-29 by Shilesh Jani
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.