I would follow Paul's recommendation here: http://home1.gte.net/res09aij/UT-3D_Readme.pdf Except, I would replace the LK ink with PK. You will need to fill this ink position yourself. An even better option is to fill this position with Epson OEM K3 PK ink, sucked out of a 4800 cart. It will give you much better Dmax on glossy (RC) papers. In summary, your inks will be: (1) Eboni for matte, (2) PK for glossy, (3) C of UT-3D, (4) LC of UT-3D, (5) LC of UT-3D, (6) LM of UT-3D, and (7) Y of UT-2 for the sepia toner. Using QTR and a densitometer, you should be able to print on all paper types with tones ranging from cold to sepia. Good luck. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "monoengland" <wilkinson27@...> wrote: > > I have an Epson 2100 dedicated to B&W. I have been trying out Lyson > monochrome ink CIS with their software (which is essentially the > Bowhaus IJC/OPM) using a densitometer to linearise. I'm not that happy > with the results. I would like to achieve neutral, cool and sepia > results on both matte(Han Photo Rag) and glossy, and would like to try > the UT inks from MIS as cartridges initially, using Quadtone RIP and > ICCs. I'm also interested in trying the newer Fibre Base Gloss > (Permajet UK). Can anyone please help me with the pros and cons of > UT3-D and UT7 inks in this quest? Many thanks. >
Message
Re: Dedicated 2100 and ink choice
2006-07-29 by Shilesh Jani
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.