Thanks John and Tyler. John, that's interesting about the numbers you check in Photoshop. That's kind of what I was wondering - and for the most part coincides with what I found on a couple of the prints I recently ordered. I agree about the proofs - I'm not selling these so I was more worried about getting as close as possible the first time to hold the cost down! Thanks again for the info! Brian http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@...> wrote: > > Like Tyler says there is no way to know how it will output with a > particular printer driver combination. I well set up system should be > close to what you view on a good monitor in greyscale mode. Mostly > what you will probably run into will be slight density differences but > you could end up with slight contrast variations as well. As we all > know slight difference in black and white output can transate into big > differences in visual impact. > > If it were me I would convert the file to Grey Gamma 2.2. View it on a > good monitor for midtone brightness. Then check the numbers in > Photoshop for your extremes with the eye dropper tool set at 3x3 > average - make sure good shadow info within important areas doesn't > drop below about 95 greyscale value in PS ( Remember 100 is pure black > and 98 and 99 is still usually visible as something other than total > black with a good inkset) and the brightest highlight values are not > blown out at 0. I will almost put any large area of tonality at at > least 1 or 2. At that point all you can do is have them do a test. > > As any good black and white printer will tell you there is so much > that is subjective, even with a perfect file. Curves is where the > creativity lies. That is why I always do proofs of everything if I can > for a client before outputting final things. I would ask for that. > Even a 5x7 proof of your file can tell you a lot. If you are in > another town and are spending money on this Fed Ex the proofs first. > > John >
Message
Re: Piezography soft proof...
2006-07-25 by Brian Chapman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.