Thanks William! It sounds like either way I need to get a printed copy of an image prior to working up a 'soft proof' layer. Brian http://www.brianchapmanphotography.com --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Iverson, William" <wiverson@...> wrote: > > See Mitch Alland's File (May 2006) in the Imageprint Yahoo Group file > section. The discussion of dot gain curves there is applicable to > Piezography (which is where it came from, originally). As Mitch argue, > it allows soft proofing directly. Myself, I've always preferred the > alternative technique Mitch discusses, of (1) getting an image that > prints reasonably well in Piezography (or Imageprint), (2) on you > monitor in Photoshop, create a curves layer such that the monitor image > matches the print as precisely as possible, and then (3) use that curves > layer as a top layer in editing subsequent images, but being careful to > disable or delete the curves layer before printing. I find this > simpler, and it's easier to do fine tweaks on a curves layer than a dot > gain layer; the curves layer functions essentially as a soft-proof > "layer," except that you have to disable it before printing -- Mitch > objects to this, but I find I can remember (almost always), and the > simplicity/flexibility outweighs that disadvantage. De gustibus non > disputandum est. > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Piezography soft proof...
2006-07-24 by Brian Chapman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.