Thanks Clayton - I think the neurons might actually be starting to fire. :) ...finally. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Clayton Jones" <cj@...> wrote: > > Hello Brian, > > >Thanks for the info! My goal is to get some consistency across my > >prints/workflow - and you're right on about 'too many workflow > >variables'!! Assuming that I follow your instructions/settings > >exactly then there shouldn't be a significant difference between BO > >and full ink when using Gamma 2.2, correct? > > Well, possibly not, because that wouldn't be following the > instructions exactly. The article recommends using DG20 for the > default gray space setting and image profile, printer profile set to > Same As Source (or No Color Management in CS2), and printer gamma 1.8. > With those settings I can go between BO and full ink printing. > That's the combination I've found that gives me the most versatility > and good WYSIWYG. It isn't carved in stone - you can use anything you > want and make it work, but there are trade-offs for everything. The > above combination is just a sort of sweet spot that I find most > convenient and hassle free. > > > > >As for my initial issue, the one potential (and potentially > >significant as you mentioned below) issue is that I may or may not > >have converted the image to grayscale prior to printing - and > >therefore the image could have been using Adobe 1998 instead of DG20 > >which may have made a difference between the two ink settings (BO & > >full ink). > > Quite possibly. I do everything in grayscale. I did lots of > experiments in the early days and found no advantage to staying in RGB > mode, with files three times as big. With a color digicam image I > manipulate the RGB channels during conversion to BW, but once that's > done I convert to grayscale. > > BTW, an important part of this workflow is having the gray space in > Color Settings set to DG20. Having it at GG2.2 and later assigning > the image profile to DG20 won't do the job. The gray space setting is > what determines the actual image pixel values at the time of grayscale > conversion (or importing a scanned neg). Assigning a different > profile later merely changes how it's displayed on screen - it won't > change the image or the print. In order to do that the profile must > be Converted. But if you convert after you have worked on the image > it will change everything you've done (it will look the same on screen > but will change the image and the print). So it's best to have it go > to the profile you want right at the beginning, whether scanning a neg > or using a color digicam file. > > Regards, > Clayton > > > Info on black and white digital printing at > http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm >
Message
Re: gamma - BO vs continuous tone
2006-04-21 by Brian Chapman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.