Hello Brian, >Thanks for the info! My goal is to get some consistency across my >prints/workflow - and you're right on about 'too many workflow >variables'!! Assuming that I follow your instructions/settings >exactly then there shouldn't be a significant difference between BO >and full ink when using Gamma 2.2, correct? Well, possibly not, because that wouldn't be following the instructions exactly. The article recommends using DG20 for the default gray space setting and image profile, printer profile set to Same As Source (or No Color Management in CS2), and printer gamma 1.8. With those settings I can go between BO and full ink printing. That's the combination I've found that gives me the most versatility and good WYSIWYG. It isn't carved in stone - you can use anything you want and make it work, but there are trade-offs for everything. The above combination is just a sort of sweet spot that I find most convenient and hassle free. >As for my initial issue, the one potential (and potentially >significant as you mentioned below) issue is that I may or may not >have converted the image to grayscale prior to printing - and >therefore the image could have been using Adobe 1998 instead of DG20 >which may have made a difference between the two ink settings (BO & >full ink). Quite possibly. I do everything in grayscale. I did lots of experiments in the early days and found no advantage to staying in RGB mode, with files three times as big. With a color digicam image I manipulate the RGB channels during conversion to BW, but once that's done I convert to grayscale. BTW, an important part of this workflow is having the gray space in Color Settings set to DG20. Having it at GG2.2 and later assigning the image profile to DG20 won't do the job. The gray space setting is what determines the actual image pixel values at the time of grayscale conversion (or importing a scanned neg). Assigning a different profile later merely changes how it's displayed on screen - it won't change the image or the print. In order to do that the profile must be Converted. But if you convert after you have worked on the image it will change everything you've done (it will look the same on screen but will change the image and the print). So it's best to have it go to the profile you want right at the beginning, whether scanning a neg or using a color digicam file. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: gamma - BO vs continuous tone
2006-04-21 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.