Hello Brian, >I did some experimenting last night and found that in order to match >my monitor I needed to use Gamma 1.8 (maybe even 1.5) when printing BO >and Gamma 2.2 when printing full ink. The Gamma settings are the ones >in the Advanced options on the printer properties (R220). All the >prints were made on EEM so there isn't anything in the paper that >would have made a difference. > >Is this something that is common or does it mean something that I'm >not aware of? It's not an easy answer because what printer gamma setting works best depends on what image profile is used. There's a sort of push-pull relationship between them. Obviously this is what works for whatever workflow you're using right now. But if you were to begin using a different default profile in color settings (which would affect how the grayscale file is initially created), there might a different result on the printer side. So you can't make a blanket statement about it. There are too many workflow variables. You just need to find the combination that you like the best. I'm using an R200 with R2-N right now, and am finding that I can use the same settings I use for BO. These are described in an article at the link below. I'm doing some experiments and will be writing an article about it soon. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: gamma - BO vs continuous tone
2006-04-20 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.