> > Then there's the glazing - cost, weight, and fragility (glass breaks, > plastic scratches). Then there's shipping (weight, fragility). And > finally a huge frame with glazing like that is a serious pain to hang > because of it's weight (takes two people). Yes there are those - probably the biggest problems - though not insurmountable and as I said - every method seems to have it's problems - face mounting, for example, can be gorgeous, but it's rather expensive - and now the face of the print is basically even more delicate than a completely bare print > > From a display standpoint, I find that big sheets of glazing create too > much glare. Yes, you can pop for anti-reflective glass, but I don't have > a rich uncle financing me at the moment. That's never really worried me that much - as long as it's well lit > The biggest problem for me is matting - in the US, the max size normally > available is 40x60 inches, which is too small to be useful if your print > is 40x50 inches. Unless your favorite matte board comes in really large > sizes, this basically limits you to prints smaller than 80 cm (31.5 in) > on the short side. we got around it this way - my framer has a really nice way of basically mitering the corners - so he's not using a single full matte and cutting a hole in it - he's basically using four sides. He doesn't try to hide it, but it's so nicely done, I've never ever had anyone comment on it - it's almost like a feature that distinguishes the large size prints. He frames for the National Gallery of Canada and it's a method he developed for large work there. tim
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Displaying large K3 prints -- same issues as with large silver halide prints
2006-03-11 by Tim Atherton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.