Bad news. Like others I had hopes for the inkset. But I'm glad you posted your results a bit early. I was just going to order some Nanochrome ink for BO printing. Chris Hargens --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Shilesh Jani" <shileshjani@b...> wrote: > > I am cross posting this message at the Epson Wide Format and Digital > BW, The Print forums. > > My fade test is at 18 days tonight. I live in the Mid South USA, and > we have been fairly sunny these last 18 days, but I did not keep > track. My original intent was to keep them exposed for 4 weeks prior > to taking a peek. But this evening I noticed one of the print on the > floor, and decided to take a quick measurement. I was not good, so > what the heck, I measured them all. > > My admittedly crude methodology was: I printed 100%, 75%, 50%, and > 25% ink limit patches of pure color on various papers using QTR. Each > 8.5 x 11 page contained 2 sets of colors. One set (Test) was was > stuck on the south facing window, the other went in the drawer (Ref). > My window is double glazed. > > Due to other attributes of NanoChrome inks, I have whittled down my > interest in these inks to using only the black ink (Dmax on HPR) in > otherwise pigments inksets. So my reporting is rather narrow, but > telling nonetheless. > > I had origianlly intended to use a friend's I1 for detailed > measurments. The limited measurements below were made with a Heiland > PM Densitometer. > > I am reporting the fade in density percent of the 25% ink coverage > patch of the black ink. > > Fade% = (1 - Test D/Ref D) x 100 > > I understand all the limitations of the test, so let us please not > get into arguments. I am happy to provide clarification, if any is > required. > > The comparison were (1) Epson R220 Dye inks, (2) NanoChrome inks > loaded on the R220 printer, and (3) Epson 4000 UC inks. > > The reults for the 25 ink limit K patch: > > Epson Premium Glossy - 5% Epson Dye, 5% Nano, 0% Epson UC PK > Epson Enhanced Matte - 4% Epson Dye, 15% Nano, 0% Epson UC MK > Hahnemuhle Photo Rag - 10% Epson Dye, 16% Nano, 0% Epson UC MK > HPR Satin - Not tested for Epson Dye, 11% Nano, 0% Epson UC MK > > Some observations - the black NanoChrome ink warm shifts > significantly. I have not made meticulous measurments of the other > pure colors, but the trend is that LM fades the most noticebly. > > So in this rather limited test, the NanoChrome black ink is no better > than Epson Dye black, and no where near Epson UC MK or UC PK. > > I must say I am dissapointed because the Dmax sure was nice on > Hahnemuhle line of papers. > > Regards. > > Shilesh >
Message
Re: NanoChrome South Window Fade Test
2006-01-27 by Chris Hargens
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.