Michael, You might try using QTR Gray-Matte.icc as your profile instead of Gray Gamma 2.2 with the K7's (profile>convert: GG 2.2 to Gray-Matte with Black Point Compensation checked). I realize that the K7 Quick Start Guide recommends GG2.2, but in my experience Gray-Matte works much better, so much so that with my 2200 if I didn't know any better, I'd say the K7 curves were designed for use with Gray-Matte.icc. I should mention though that this is with Innova Photo Smooth Cotton and using a hardware calibrated monitor. With this work flow, the prints look very much like my monitor - no soft proofing needed. I've never thought the K7's lacked any punch compared to any other inks I've ever used or seen, including Piezos, MIS, UC's or K3's and they are incredibly smooth. The other option you might try is to have a proper profile built for you, though without a hardware calibrated monitor, all bets are off. Will --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Michael Vendrell <mjvendrell2@y...> wrote: > Am I missing something, or do I have some setting > wrong in the QTR for the NK7's in the 2200, such that > I must almost max out the ink limits and density to > get a WYSIWYG with this system? The WYSIWYG with the > other two systems is quite close even though I have > only calibrated my monitor visually with the Adobe > gamma loader. Any thoughts and advice would be > appreciated. > > Michael Vendrell, MD. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
Message
Re: Piezo NK7 vs R220 UTR2 W vs C86 EZW
2006-01-15 by wjlafever
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.