--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, hogarth@s... wrote: ... > Yes. Given a choice of 2.3+ Dmax on gloss, semi-gloss, or matte paper, I > would almost certainly pick the matte paper. I don't think I'm alone in > that. The market is there. It's just a matter of time. Bruce, Todd Gangler here in Seattle is one of the only (perhaps now the only) people making tri-color carbro prints left n the world. Near Ciba gamut and density on beautiful Magnani fine art papers, no glitzy gloss or fake surface. Incredibly beautiful, and inherently photographic. I've never seen anything like them, perhaps old dye transfer. I've heard people say inkjet prints on art papers are not photographs, as though only a photo paper surface is a photograph. I honestly don't know what they mean. Anyway, in terms of the nature of the media, it's whole new world in my opinion. But as above, the marketplace may dictate otherwise. Also, I think other inks need to be developed. Lyson dye or even Epson dye prints on the same fine art papers blow the UCs out of the water, but of course don't have Wilhelm's blessings. Mine either I guess. Tyler
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Thoughts on the new Epsons
2005-05-25 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.