Steve Kale wrote: > And when it works well it will return to the "fine art" world with a > vengeance. The first step is to get pigment inks that can sit well on > coated papers - eradicating the typically termed bronzing and gloss > differential issues. Parallel development is also occurring with > respect to coatings which come closer to traditional finishes. In my > opinion, we are getting ever closer to replicating the prior > "standard" - air-dried, fibre-based, (glossy) silver gelatin print. > There's nothing to say that this need be the "standard" but the allure > of a fully-useable 2.3+ dMax range with a traditional "look" will be > enormously strong for as long as matte printing remains stuck down at > dMaxs of 1.6-7. Absolutely. What is driving the market toward this "standard" is the laws of physics. It's easier to get higher Dmax on a glossier surface than on a matte surface. What we want, is the higher Dmax, not necessarily the glossier surface. > Now, of course, there are others working on new inks that have already > achieved in tests dMax of well over 2.0, extending to match today's > photo black output and traditional print dMax. It remains to be seen > as to whether these inks can come successfully to market. Yes. Hopefully sooner rather than later. > The real test of what will be the new "standard" will only come when > inks on matte papers can achieve the same useable dynamic range of the > current "traditional standard". Until then matte paper output is > playing a fill-in role while photo paper output develops rapidly to > meet its predecessor. Personally I would like to see a bit more > balanced advances to both. I'd much prefer a cotton paper print over > a photo/fibre print IF it had the same dynamic range. Unfortunately, > though, this will require some very radical rethinking of ink > technology and perhaps the standards by which its longevity is > judged. But it is still very early days in the digital printing of > photographs and we have a lot to look forward to. Yes. Given a choice of 2.3+ Dmax on gloss, semi-gloss, or matte paper, I would almost certainly pick the matte paper. I don't think I'm alone in that. The market is there. It's just a matter of time. -- Bruce Watson
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Thoughts on the new Epsons
2005-05-25 by hogarth@snappydsl.net
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.