Digital BW, The Print

Yep, I think Paul told me that.

It's the "glossy coated" pigments that still have me worried.

I'm kind of in a quandry on how to play this.  Go for the proven 2200 or
jump to the 1800 with the much smaller squirter and hope for a good set of
updated inks for CIS or refillables.  Of course, it'll take a rip to make it
work.

Seth 

==-----Original Message-----
==From: Steve Kale [mailto:stevekale@...] 
==
==
==Glop is not used when matte paper is selected.  It is an RC 
==(ie glossy) paper thing....
==
==
==> From: Seth <seth@...>
==> 
==> 
==> I KNOW it's expensive; and, I know it's time consuming.  Any chance 
==> you'd run that same battery of tests on Epson double weight 
==matte or 
==> similar paper?
==> 
==> Seth
==> 
==> ==-----Original Message-----
==> ==From: Bob Frost [mailto:bob@...] == ==When some of us were 
==> recently discussing Epson's use of GLOP (Gloss
==> ==Optimiser) in the R800, Koloshor suggested that the only way ==to 
==> resolve the matter was to look at a print file and see ==which inks 
==> were used where.
==> ==
==> ==With Roy Harrington's help, I've done that as follows.
==> ==
==> --snip---
==> 
==
==
==
==