Digital BW, The Print

Dear Alan,

Frankly, I've been bewildered by your posts on this board regarding
receiving no email response from me to your inquiries.

I've emailed you twice, and my business partner Charles James emailed you
once.  Have you not received our emails?  We have been "replying" to your
email address ending with -      USA.com

Please check your mail and correct your statements on this board regarding a
lack of response from BowHaus, or at least post my 300+ word email to you
from Jan 4, 2005.

Joe


On 1/5/05 12:51 PM, "A. Huntley" <Alan.Huntley@...> wrote:

> Joe,
> 
> Per your postings, I see that you follow this forum so I will post an
> opinion, here; though public, I seem to be unable to reach Bowhaus via
> private e-mail. Please understand that I do not mean to pontificate negative
> comments vis-a-vis Bowhaus, but I just thought you should be aware of the
> feelings of someone who was a potential Bowhaus customer.
> 
> Following your post regarding the pre-release pricing for the first version
> of IJC/OPM, I attempted to get in touch with your company for days before we
> all became aware of your DSL issues. I, as well as others on this forum, had
> quite a few questions I/we wanted answered before making a purchase
> decision. I guess all my e-mails were lost because, to date, I've heard
> nothing! Antonis was very gracious with his knowledge, but I can not justify
> the purchase of IJC/OPM based solely on one person's opinion; albeit a very
> knowledgeable opinion.
> 
> I, for one, think that your very short timeframe for taking advantage of the
> pre-release offer is ridiculous; especially given the fact that no one could
> communicate with the company for several days! And, once you announced that
> Bowhaus was "back on the air" no mention that today's deadline might be /
> would be extended. Well, sir, you have lost me as a customer! You have
> probably lost a few other potential customers on this forum, too. I've been
> in the computer industry since its infancy, and seen the rise of the desktop
> and all that it has to offer. But, I remain mystified how most software
> companies even stay in business--yes, even the giant of 'em all: Microsoft!
> <Rant over...strolling across the room to cuddle up to my Mac>
> 
> Regards,
> Alan Huntley
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Berndt" <joeberndt@...>
> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [Digital BW] IJC/ OPM_windows some more questions to decide
> 
> 
> 
> Hello Bill,
> 
> Version 1.0.0 of OPM only supports a USB connection either direct or via a
> USB hub.
> 
> I do know that on the larger printers( e.g. 9600) you can have multiple
> connections to your printer, If you set the connection type to ³auto² the
> printer will respond to what ever it receives a signal from.  I don¹t know
> if you can also add a USB cable to your 2200 and have it auto sense.
> 
> Joe 
> 
> 
> 
> 




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]