I had the same exact problem with my 2200 (prints looking green in daylight), even using the Epson Gray Balancer software. I recently switched to using MIS UT7 inkset and am very impressed with the results. For more info on these inks, got to www.inksupply.com or www.paulroark.com. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, <jm- ferreira@b...> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I've been playing around with my new 2100/2200 Epson printer for a couple of > weeks now, and although I'm quite pleased with the overall print quality, I > really think that the metamerism issue is unacceptable. > > > > A bit of background: I'm used to print large-format negatives on Ilford > paper (fibre base warm tone and selenium toned examples of that colour can > be seen here: http://www.jmf-photo.net/franca.html ). This combination > gives me the expected colour at all times, regardless of the light source > temperature (I know there's always a slight shift even with silver prints, > but I never noticed it ) > > > > Anyway, I try to have that kind of colour on my digital prints, by > "brown-toning" them. > > The prints coming out of the Epson look just fine and match what I have on > the display, as long as it's not daylight. When I view them the morning next > day, they're green If I do the necessary changes for them to be acceptable > by daylight, they will look awful in the evening. This only happens with > "toned black and white" photos; full colour photos come out fine and look > pretty much the same under any lighting situations (here's an example of > what I mean by "full colour": http://www.jmf-photo.net/ . > > > > I checked alternative ways of printing my B&W work with a warm tone, but the > only thing I could find was the PiezoTone inks (warm neutral and carbon > sepia) which I don't particularly like because I would be stuck with the > same "standard" colour. > > > > Is there any other way of achieving what I want, or am I missing something? > > > > Thanks for any suggestions. > > > > José Miguel Ferreira > > <http://www.jmf-photo.net> http://www.jmf-photo.net > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: Is metamerism acceptable?
2005-01-05 by bghess_sp
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.