Don, you are right about the inkjet label problem. I have it even though I use a Colorspan 11 color printer for my fine art prints. No banding, and absolutely wonderful blacks (either 4K or 11color). To some degree I get around this with always showing a 4¹ by 5¹ print drum scanned etc from original 11² X 14² chrome. Public does not associate this size and quality print (and my others by association) with an inkjet printer. Additionally, I label them as ³microthermal² prints. J Vee (www.jvee.com) On 11/30/04 10:59 AM, "hill14701" <hill14701@...> wrote: > > Digital output onto real black and white papers is exciting if you have been > trying to get > your Epson to print completely without banding - or visible dither. Most > people still frown > at the fact that the print you want to sell for $200 was made on a home > printer. Even if > you highlight the details of carbon based printing and all the hard work you > spent trying > to linearize the print, they still see it as an inkjet. I realize that many > of you supplement > your income with print sales, and many of you have stories of how you have > made it with > an inkjet - but the uneducated masses still don't think an inkjet is worthy of > fine art > status. Please don't get mad at me and send ranting emails, I am just > repeating what my > clients tell me. > > Don > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Digital Enlarger FYI - do you need fiber?
2004-11-30 by J Vee
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.