If you need Fibre based papers, you are fairly limited in your digital output options. The current generation of RC papers has tested to be as good as fiber - if both are archivally washed. Between the two, you will need to make sure that your lab has adequate washing methods in place for that $75.00 11x14 digital enlargement. I got over the RC vs Fibre thing a while ago. Under glass, they both have a distinct yet harmonious look. My digital prints made on a lustre surface have a beauty and depth that equals that of fibre. With proper fixing and toning you can extend the life of any black and white traditonal print, and for an 11x14, I'd rather pay 8.79 Digital output onto real black and white papers is exciting if you have been trying to get your Epson to print completely without banding - or visible dither. Most people still frown at the fact that the print you want to sell for $200 was made on a home printer. Even if you highlight the details of carbon based printing and all the hard work you spent trying to linearize the print, they still see it as an inkjet. I realize that many of you supplement your income with print sales, and many of you have stories of how you have made it with an inkjet - but the uneducated masses still don't think an inkjet is worthy of fine art status. Please don't get mad at me and send ranting emails, I am just repeating what my clients tell me. Don
Message
Re: Digital Enlarger FYI - do you need fiber?
2004-11-30 by hill14701
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.