Digital BW, The Print

On Nov 29, 2004, at 4:19 PM, Tyler Boley wrote:

>
>
> This is interesting, it seems an odd option considering the other
> kinds of digital output these days. I'm still wondering when a lighjet
> type exposure on good fiber B&W papers is going to happen. It seems
> for now, exposure and processing are all self contained with Lightjet
> so RC is necessary. Don't see why it couldn't be separated.
> But I can see why you'd be interested in checking it out, too bad
> about the result.

Actually, one of our photo/imaging departments here was looking at this 
exact device - the main reason being an enlarger is a very quick way to 
crank out prints compared to an inkjet. I'm not a darkroom guy so I'm 
more comfortable with inkjets, but for 8x10 prints en masse this kind 
of setup seems very desirable, especially when you already have an 
environment/staff with literally hundreds of years of experience in the 
darkroom...

I'm surprised at the results the OP got... the cost of these things is 
pretty high - I was told around $30,000 or so - and they claim to have 
3200x2400 resolution (though I'm a bit skeptical - it seems an odd 
aspect ratio to use unless you're just using four 1600x1200 panels, or 
interpolating or otherwise enhancing the rez). If it has true 3200x2400 
resolution it should be able to deliver nice prints - though I suppose 
without some kind of blurring/antialiasing above a certain size I guess 
you're bound to see the LCD's grid (unless you defocus). Interested in 
any more details on this process.