--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Walker Blackwell" <lists@g...> wrote: > We have to realize that these prints are not > photographs persay. They're physically more like > charcoal drawings on newsprint or watercolors on > watercolor paper. As an artist I've been using Canson Mi Teintes pastel paper for years, hanging it all over my house, often without any glass in front and I've NEVER had any yellowing. (BTW I had a show at a local gallery last May of inkjet prints on Canson Mi Teintes using the flat- feed feature of my 2200. That printer will print on damn near anything!) > All of my current clients know this about digital prints. > It's a major consideration when getting into this whole > shibang. It's also something that's pushing me away from > being in Chicago and driving me back home to Vermont. > There's way less pollution out there, you know? Wrongo! Vermont is downwind of the ENTIRE COUNTRY and parts of Canada. Vermont has, among other things, the worst acid rain problem in the US. It also gets a lot of other junk. My brother lives in the northern kingdom and could tell you horror stories. Still, it really says something about how unreliable inkjet printing technology is if people are actually considering MOVING just to get more stable prints.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Toxic yellow photorag!
2004-10-27 by Peter Nelson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.