You have good points there. I thought you were refering to carbon pigments shifting and staining. Monochrome color prints are vulnerable, and I would always spray them with Premier Art, Lascaux, or Lyson Printguard. One of the things that Wilhelm found out the hard way was that inkjet prints, of all kinds, are vulnerable to contaminants in the air which are easily absorbed into the pores of the media. They act almost like a magnet for pollution. The swellable polimer inkjet media was designed to counteract that but it was designed for dye prints not pigment prints like we use. As you pointed out, gelatin silver is a much harder and more impervious surface for pollution and toxants to penetrate. My belief from the research of Wilhelm and others is that if you are going to work with rag media with the photo inkjet process you need to either keep the prints in a portfolio away from junk in the atmosphere, keep them behind plexi or glass, or do as I usually do, spray them with one of the non-yellowing sealant sprays. But don't tell me that traditional color dye coupler color photographs held up well in normal conditions because I can show you a closet full of yellowed and faded and stained artwork on those papers that were only done 20 years ago, thanks to big Kokak's lack of interest in preservation. I still contend however that if you had put any art media that was produced on a soft 100% rag paper in a drawer it could have just as easily yellowed. It's not the problem with inkjet photography, it is a fact of using delicate papers that we all like so well. They are just different, and shouldn't be used by the masses if they are not cared for. Give the general public sprayed RC prints and put them in sleeves. john
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Toxic yellow photorag!
2004-10-26 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.